Communitas

Blabbings about family, community, sustainability and life from Frederick, MD.

The Book of Our Future April 20, 2007

Deep Economy, Bill McKibben’s new book, does the best job of laying out the social and environmental ills of our day and the path to fixing them. Put another way, it is hard to think of a more important book.

“Social and environmental ills” is a poor phrase. The word “Environment” is often thrown around in the context of political issues, like “Transportation” or “Education.” We’ve become so abstracted from our natural existence that “the Environment” seems to sit appropriately lined up side by side those other “issues.”

However we distance ourselves from it, the reality remains that we are creatures living on a planet, depending upon that planet and one another for our existence. And in that context, the environment and our society is EVERYTHING: it is our lives themselves and the existence of our species and fellow living creatures. And it is at that profound level that McKibben looks at our ills.

McKibben begins by explaining how for all of human existence, MORE has always meant BETTER. More warmth, more shelter, more nourishment, more resources always rightly meant a better life. Humans used their minds to generate MORE, and certain principles of economy, efficiency and capitalism became the best ways to organize and operate to produce MORE.

The invention of the steam engine in 1712, the first industrial use of fossil fuels, marked a profound change in humanity’s ability to produce MORE. The solar energy of eons, stored in fossil fuels, was unlocked for human use.

After three centuries of fossil fuel use, however, things have changed–at least for the industrialized world. For the first time MORE does not necessarily mean BETTER. In fact, no only do we have more than ENOUGH, but MORE is more and more yielding WORSE. Specifically MORE is:

  1. generating more social inequity
  2. destroying our planet and our existence upon it. Global warming is the attention-grabber here, but it goes beyond that. Modernity’s use of fossil fuels and other natural resources is simply unsustainable.
  3. breaking the bonds between one another, hollowing our communities and our humanity. Interdependence is a good thing, and we’ve lost it.

The problem is that the correlation of MORE to BETTER is so deeply ingrained in our collective psyche is it unfathomable to break the connection. So we go on, building houses that are TOO big and TOO far apart, driving our cars TOO much, working TOO much, eating TOO much food that is TOO processed, living in TOO mobile, TOO global of a economy and society. I’ve read many books on the destruction of the environment or on the dearth of community in our day, but I’ve never before read a book that ties the two together so eloquently, tracing it all to the excesses of fossil fuels and the pursuit of MORE.

McKibben of course recognizes that capitalism and democracy are the best ways to organize society. In fact, many detractors, hoping to see McKibben as some freakish communist, would be surprised to know McKibben to be a Sunday school teacher (liberalism and Christianity can co-exist; they can even thrive–consider the radical Christ was in his day). The solution that he proposes is “localism” — living in smaller communities, within regional economies, in a life that is somehow a little less competitive and a lot less fossil fuel dependent.

While some Vermont antecdotes paint a nice picture of what localism might look like, how this occurs exactly is a question he does not fully answer–he never gets much beyond the construct of a farmer’s market. It makes me think of latter 20th century Latin American economies that tried to become “localized,” to stay capitalist but be entirely self-sufficient with huge tariffs. That was a huge flop. To turn your back to global competition seems like a bad idea.

So figuring out this balancing act–reducing the scope of our economy, the scope of our lives to something more human in scale, while recognizing that competition and openness are the best drivers of beneficial cooperation in our society–is a question left unanswered. It will continue to be pondered here.

An easy answer is peak oil. The global economy can only function because of cheap, abundant energy. If the supply of fossil fuels tightens and the the prices rises dramatically, getting our TV’s from China (that contains parts shipped in from Holland, Brazil and Indonesia; built by workers fed on food from the U.S., Canada and Russia) no longer works that well. Localism would be forced upon us.

But such a calamity is not to be wished upon the world. Instead of a shock, let’s hope such a transition happens gradually over a long period of time. But while the delay would prevent economic disaster, our souls and environment will continue to rot. Somehow we all need to see the benefits of a more localized society and voluntarily move toward it.

Reading Deep Economy would be a good start. I hope you do it.

 

The Long Emergency September 19, 2006

Filed under: books,Sprawl,sustainability — tobymurdock @ 2:43 pm

About a month ago i finished this book, The Long Emergency, but James Howard Kunstler. I had read him before in Home from Nowhere: he is a very articulate voice about sprawl with great recognition of not just its environmental impacts but also its spiritual and community impacts.

The Long Emergency is nuts. It freaks you out. Part of that is because Kunstler is fast and loose with the facts, I think (the facts on this issue are very hard to come by anyhow).

The major thrust of The Long Emergency is about how every part of our civilized life relies completely upon cheap, abundant fossil fuel and the supply of such fuels is about to run out. This is an phenomena everyone is aware of, but Kunstler really sharpens the immediacy and the magnitude of its impact.

First he points out our incredible fossil fuel dependency: how everything in our lives runs on oil and coal. It seems that civilization has been some great march forward of technological progress, but it really was all about inventing the steam engine and then incrementally improving that technology and its exploitation of millions of years of solar energy (stored in fossil fuels). The USA is particularly screwed in that its entire infrasturcure is way more dependent of cheap energy than any other part of the world and it will be helpless with that energy.
He then talks about how the supply is running out. The numbers here are debateable of course, but the finite nature of the supply is undisputable, of course. More importantly, he illustrates how all of the proposed alternatives–hydrogen, ethanol, bio-diesel, solar, wind, hydroelectric–won’t come close to supplying our current demand. There is one and only one source of energy: nuclear reaction. Our solar system’s sun is the biggest source of nuclear energy we can harness. Fossil fuels represent millions of years of stored energy from the sun: a one-time supply that can’t be replaced. Our own man-made nuclear reactors are the only thing he recognizes that will “keep the lights on” (he notes that there is a good supply of remaining uranium).

He then goes on with predictions of how the world will revert to a late 18th century type of civilzation: much less energy consumption, much more localized and with a much much reduced population (he postulates that the “natural” carrying capacity of Earth for humans is 1 billion). The transition to this fossil-fuel-less society will be ugly with lots of mayhem, disease, war, etc.

Unfortunately Kunstler seems to delight all too much in the coming of his predicted Dark Ages. It seems that he has a long-standing grudge against civilzation and he seeks disaster to find revenge. This bitter edge undermines his credibility and makes this book appealing only to those already with an interest in sustainability; it does nothing to communicate to those who most need the message.

But the message remains a most powerful one. I highly recommend the book. It clearly lays out the various factors at work and how they will effect us, even if the forecast is a little too pessimistic. Pick it up and read it . . . and then start working on changing you, your neighborhood and your country’s energy dependency!